DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURE OF YOUTH LEISURE INSTITUTIONS ABROAD
https://doi.org/10.37909/2542-1352-2022-3-3003
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to analyze the development of architecture of youth leisure institutions abroad. Identification of the main periods, as well as regional peculiarities, consideration of the most important approaches and principles of designing youth leisure institutions in the XX century. The greatest attention is paid to Europe as the birthplace of most modern trends in the field of youth leisure architecture, and the distinctive features of some other regions that influenced the development of this architecture are also indicated: the USA, Asia. The periodization of the development of youth leisure institutions is given on the example of Europe. At the present stage, the trends of developing countries are also considered, attention is focused on the formation of some general global trends.
About the Author
E. S. Svechkar
Academy of Architecture and Arts of the Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate
References
1. Dumazedier J. Sociologie empirique du loisir: Critique et contre-critique de la civilisation du loisir. Paris: Éditions du Seui, 1974. 269 pp.
2. Луков А.В. Социокультурные основания субъективности российской молодежи тезаурсная концепция молодежи): дис. д-р.социол. наук: 22.00.06. М. 2019. 438 с.
3. History of the Holiday Center for Working Youth Ottendorf [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://english.ottendorf.space/geschichte (дата обращения 08.09.2022)
4. Fache W. The origins and development of open youth centres and their operating characteristics in Flanders // Youth Partnership. 2012. Vol. 3, No. 16. pp. 167-177.
5. Gosseye J., Heynen H. Architecture for leisure in post-war Europe, 1945-1989: Between experimentation, liberation and patronisation // The Journal of Architecture. 2013. Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 623-621.
6. Avermaete T. A thousand youth clubs: Architecture, mass leisure and the rejuvenation of post-war France // The Journal of Architecture. 2018. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 617-631.
7. «Седрик Прайс придумывал архитектуру, которая может подстраиваться под поведение людей». 2019 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://archi.ru/world/81116/sedrik-praispridumyval-arkhitekturu-kotoraya-mozhet-podstraivatsya-pod-povedenie-lyudei (дата обращения 22.09.2022)
8. Нагаева З.С., Мосякин Д.С. Актуальность создания системы молодежных центров // Строительство и техногенная безопасность. 2018. № 1. С. 35-44.
9. Усманов М.С. Функционально-планировочная организация учреждений досуга молодежи в крупнейших городах. Том 1.: дис. канд. архитектуры: 18.00.02. Ташкент. 1985. 154 с.
10. Соколова В.И. Зарождение молодежного движения в мире (вторая половина ХIХ начало ХХ веков) // Вестник Чувашского университета. 2014. No. 4, pp. 85-90.
11. Faché W. Organisation of information and counselling activities in youth information and counselling centres // In: Compendium on National Youth Information and Counselling Structures. Luxembourg: European Youth Information and Counselling Agency. 2014. pp. 102-105.
12. Свечкарь Е.С. Особенности формирования современных молодежных центров // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2022. №3(60). С. 112-126. URL: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2022/2kvart22/PDF/07_svechkar.pdf DOI: 10.24412/1998-4839-2022-3-112-126
Review
For citations:
Svechkar E.S. DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHITECTURE OF YOUTH LEISURE INSTITUTIONS ABROAD. Creativity and Modernity. 2022;(3):21-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37909/2542-1352-2022-3-3003
Views:
22
JATS XML
Email this article 