All-Seasonality of Public Space

Relevance. Public spaces are significant elements of the urban environment that support communication, recreation, everyday mobility, cultural practices, and event-based activity. However, in regions with pronounced seasonal variability, the physical openness and formal improvement of a territory do not guarantee its full functioning throughout the year. In cold and sharply continental climates, many open spaces are used more actively during the warm season, whereas in winter and transitional periods pedestrian routes, duration of stay, microclimatic protection, lighting, antiicing maintenance, and seasonal scenarios become more important. The term “all-seasonality” is increasingly used in academic and professional discourse, yet it is often not clearly distinguished from year-round accessibility, year-round operation, and winter landscaping. This limits its applicability as an architectural and environmental category. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to clarify the meaning of the concept of “all-seasonality of public space” and to identify its main components as a design-formed property of the architectural environment. Materials and methods. The study is based on the analysis of scientific works on public space theory, human-centered urban design, winter urbanism, climate adaptation, and seasonal transformation of open urban territories. The research uses conceptual and terminological analysis, comparative analytical method, and structural-logical generalization. Results. The article distinguishes between year-round accessibility, year-round operation, and all-seasonality of public space. Year-round accessibility refers to the possibility of physical access to a territory in different seasons; year-round operation refers to the technical and organizational capacity to maintain and service the space throughout the year; all-seasonality is defined as a qualitative property of the architectural environment that ensures the preservation or seasonal reproduction of meaningful scenarios of staying, movement, communication, recreation, and event-based activity. Six components of all-seasonality are identified: functional, social, climatic, infrastructural-operational, scenario-based, and visual-environmental. Conclusions. All-seasonality of public space is not identical to year-round openness and cannot be reduced to separate winter attractions, seasonal decoration, or technical maintenance. It is a complex design-formed property of the architectural environment based on the interaction of functions, microclimate, infrastructure, scenarios of use, social activity, and architectural-artistic expressiveness. Clarifying this concept makes it possible to move from a general description of winter or year-round use toward a professional assessment of the quality of public space functioning throughout the annual cycle.

1. Arendt H. Vita activa, ili O deyatel'noy zhizni [The Human Condition]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya, 2000. 437 p.

2. Babarykina D.V. Aktual'nye podkhody k ponimaniyu obshchestvennykh prostranstv: ponyatiya, protsessy, klassifikatsii ispol'zovaniya [Current approaches tounderstanding public spaces: concepts, processes, classifications of use]. Privolzhskiy nauchnyy zhurnal [Privolzhsky Scientific Journal]. 2024. No. 2.

3. Babarykina D.V. Mezhdunarodnyy opyt proektirovaniya obshchestvennykh prostranstv v usloviyakh kholodnogo klimata [International experience in designing public spaces in cold climates]. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2024. No. 2(67). P. 130–142. DOI: 10.24412/1998-4839-2024-2-130-142.

4. Babarykina D.V. Rossiyskiy opyt proektirovaniya obshchestvennykh prostranstv vsesezonnogo ispol'zovaniya [Russian experience in designing public spaces for all-season use]. Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov [Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education]. 2025. No. 1(89). DOI: 10.47055/19904126_2025_1(89)_21.

5. Batalina T.S. Analiz osobennostey formirovaniya obshchestvennogo prostranstva [Analysis of the features of public space formation]. Biznes i dizayn revyu [Business and Design Review]. 2017. No. 1(5).

6. Carr S., Francis M., Rivlin L.G., Stone A.M. Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 400 p.

7. Chapman D., Nilsson K., Larsson A., Rizzo A. Climatic barriers to soft-mobility in winter: Luleå, Sweden as case study. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2017. Vol. 35. P. 574–580. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.003.

8. Chapman D. Urban Design of Winter Cities: Winter Season Connectivity for Soft Mobility. Doctoral thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2018.

9. Donaldson G.C., Ermakov S.P., Komarov Y.M., McDonald C.P., Keatinge W.R. Cold related mortalities and protection against cold in Yakutsk, eastern Siberia: observation and interview study. BMJ. 1998. Vol. 317. P. 978–982.

10. Gehl J. Goroda dlya lyudey [Cities for People]. Moscow: Al'pina Publisher, 2012. 276 p.

11. Gel'fond A.L. Obshchestvennoe zdanie i obshchestvennoe prostranstvo: dualizm otnosheniy [Public building and public space: dualism of relations]. Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2015. No. 2. P. 20–33.

12. Jacobs J. Smert' i zhizn' bol'shikh amerikanskikh gorodov [The Death and Life of Great American Cities]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2011. 460 p.

13. Krasheninnikov A.V. MAKRO-prostranstva gorodskoy sredy [Macro-spaces of the urban environment]. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii [Architecture and Modern Information Technologies]. 2016. No. 3(36).

14. Mänty J., Pressman N. Cities Designed for Winter. Helsinki: Building Book Ltd, 1988. 123 p.

15. Werner J. Outdoor Comfort in Cold Climates: Integrating Microclimate Factors in Urban Design. Doctoral thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2016.